Political sources in Yemen have revealed a growing rift among the international sponsors of the Yemeni peace process over the option of supporting a military solution to end the Houthi insurgency.

According to informed diplomatic sources, the majority of the 10 key stakeholders, excluding the United States and the United Kingdom, are in favor of backing the internationally recognized government to pursue a decisive military campaign to retake Sana’a and other Houthi-held territories.

Government Appeals and Western Reservations

The Yemeni government has repeatedly urged both regional and international actors to provide direct military support to end the coup and neutralize what it describes as “an Iranian project” that threatens regional and global security through the Houthis’ militant control.

Despite a widespread belief among these countries that military intervention is the shortest and most viable path to resolve the conflict, the US and UK maintain a divergent stance, preferring a diplomatic route due to humanitarian concerns and regional complexities.

Strong Army, Limited Firepower

Although the Yemeni National Army has significantly improved its operational readiness and combat experience, it lacks sufficient military hardware and aerial support, sources say. Meanwhile, Houthi forces are heavily armed with Iranian-supplied weapons and equipment seized from the former national army.

A Standoff Between Diplomacy and Decisiveness

This divergence in international positions is complicating the political landscape and prolonging the conflict. While many argue that force is now a necessity, Washington and London remain firm in seeking a negotiated solution, even as the security situation on the ground continues to deteriorate.